News Links Section | PixoBebo by Kate MacKenzie </head> <body id="news"> <div id="wrapper_news"> <a name="top" id="top"></a> <div id="wrapper_header"> <div id="region_header"> <div class="ad_leaderboard_728x90"> <script type='text/javascript'></script><noscript><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=a5ee6e6b&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=21204&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a5ee6e6b' border='0' alt='' /></a></noscript> </div> <div id="logo"> <a href="http://pixobebo.com/" title="PixoBebo Home Page"><img src="http://pixobebo.com.s3.amazonaws.com/logo.png" alt="Logo" /></a> </div> </div> </div> <div id="wrapper_middle"> <div id="region_left"> <div class="region_pad"> </div> </div> <div id="region_main"> <div id="navmenu"><ul> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/" title="PixoBebo Home Page">Home</a></li> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/reviews/" title="Mac Software Reviews">Reviews</a></li> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/how_to/" title="Software How To">How To</a></li> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/opinions/" title="Opinions">Opinions</a></li> <li class="active"><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/news/" title="News & Commentary Links">News Links</a></li> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/archive/" title="PixoBebo Archive">Archive</a></li> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/search/" title="Advanced Search">Search</a></li> <li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/mobile/" title="PixoBebo for iPhone">Mobile</a></li> </ul></div> <div class="region_pad"> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Tuesday, March 9, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/03/mozilla-borrows-from-webkit-to-build-fast-new-js-engine.ars" title="If you can't beat 'em, join 'em">If you can't beat 'em, join 'em</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/if_you_cant_beat_em_join_em/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>After falling behind Apple’s Safari, Google’s Chrome, and Opera in the browser Javascript rendering wars, Mozilla is working on a new version of Firefox with a new Javascript engine. Ryan Paul in <a href="http://arstechnica.com/open-source/news/2010/03/mozilla-borrows-from-webkit-to-build-fast-new-js-engine.ars" title="Ars">Ars</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>The secret sauce that will drive Mozilla’s new JavaScript engine engine into the fast lane is some code borrowed from Apple’s WebKit project. Mozilla intends to bring together the powerful optimization techniques of TraceMonkey and the extremely efficient native code generator of Apple’s JSCore engine. The mashup will likely deliver a significant boost in Firefox’s JavaScript execution speed, making Mozilla’s browser a formidable contender in the ongoing JavaScript speed race.</p></blockquote> <p>If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-htc-lawsuit-2010-3" title="Apple's HTC Lawsuit: Behind The Scenes">Apple's HTC Lawsuit: Behind The Scenes</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apples_htc_lawsuit_behind_the_scenes/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Apple’s HTC Lawsuit: Behind The Scenes"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>From <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/apples-htc-lawsuit-2010-3" title="Business Insider">Business Insider</a>, Jay Yarow sums up all the little behind the scenes pieces of Apple’s lawsuit against HTC:</p> <ul><li>Until now, smartphone makers were trying to match Apple’s user experience, and not thinking about patents. Now all the companies are checking patents before proceeding.</li><li>Apple’s legal actions have “temporarily left competitors playing catch-up with their shoelaces tied.”</li><li>Post-lawsuit, handset makers are wondering if Android is the best way to topple Apple.</li><li>That’s leading to a renewed interest in partnering with Microsoft, and its new Windows Phone Series 7.</li></ul> <p>What goes around, comes around. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Monday, March 8, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100308/htc-may-bring-knife-to-apple-gun-fight/" title="HTC May End Up Bringing Knife to Apple Gun Fight">HTC May End Up Bringing Knife to Apple Gun Fight</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/htc_may_end_up_bringing_knife_to_apple_gun_fight/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: HTC May End Up Bringing Knife to Apple Gun Fight"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Apple’s patent fight against handset maker HTC has all the makings of a <em><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunfight_at_the_O.K._Corral" title="Gunfight At The OK Corral">Gunfight At The OK Corral</a></em>. Except Apple is there with guns, and poor old HTC has a pocket knife. John Paczkowski in <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100308/htc-may-bring-knife-to-apple-gun-fight/" title="AllThingsDigital">AllThingsDigital</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>A Deutsche Bank analysis of yearly patent filings by Apple (AAPL), HTC and Google (GOOG) reveals that Apple is by far the leader and HTC the laggard. Over the past few years, Apple has amassed some 3,000 patents, HTC just 58.</p></blockquote> <p>Ouch. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Friday, March 5, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/sony-to-stop-apple-dead-in-its-tracks-with-iphone-and-ipad-killers-2010035/" title="Geek Plus Sony Minus Apple Equals Fail">Geek Plus Sony Minus Apple Equals Fail</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/geek_plus_sony_minus_apple_equals_fail/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Geek Plus Sony Minus Apple Equals Fail"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>What happens when you give typing lessons to a geek wannabe? Critical thinking disappears. Christian Zibreg in <a href="http://www.geek.com/articles/mobile/sony-to-stop-apple-dead-in-its-tracks-with-iphone-and-ipad-killers-2010035/" title="Geek">Geek</a> on <em>Sony to stop Apple dead in its tracks with iPhone and iPad killers</em>:</p> <blockquote><p>Sony won’t put up with Apple’s aggressive expansion into its own turf anymore.</p></blockquote> <p>Uh oh. Here it comes again. Another Apple iPhone, iPod, iPad killer. Do you mind if I dismiss Sony’s efforts to get back in the game?</p> <blockquote><p>Anyone dismissing Sony’s renewed attempts to slow down Apple needs a reality check. Yes, one could say that Sony lost its touch with consumers by allowing Apple to take over the music space. You could also blame them for losing ground in just about every consumer electronics category except gaming.</p></blockquote> <p>One could argue that Apple’s iPod touch success, in heavy use by casual gamers, is as much a game success as Sony’s recent <em>gaming</em> efforts. Alright. I’ll bite. Apple’s products have been kicking Sony’s products—hardware, software, online—since the iPod debuted in 2001. So, why should Apple quake in fear of Sony’s newest renewed efforts?</p> <blockquote><p>Sony has been around since the end of World War II, long before Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak created the first personal computer in Jobs’ parents’ garage.</p></blockquote> <p>And that’s an argument how? How many of Sony’s executives from before Apple’s birth are still at Sony? My guess? Zero. Surely there’s more to this effort to pump up Sony’s repeatedly anemic efforts to reclaim past glory.</p> <blockquote><p>Sony commands vast categories, unlike the self-proclaimed consumer electronics giant Apple which only plays in phones, computers, and music.</p></blockquote> <p>So does Microsoft, yet their efforts to venture into portable media players, game consoles, and smart phones have met with terrible financial losses. I see more of a Sony comparison to Microsoft than to Godzilla awakening to reclaim his island from Apple.</p> <blockquote><p>Sony is one of the world’s largest media conglomerates and a top player in electronics, games, and entertainment. While Jobs boasted the fact that the $15.68 billion revenue in the last quarter made Apple a $50 billion company, Sony’s fiscal year 2008 revenue exceeded $78.88 billion. Although down from $90.5 billion a year earlier, it’s still way more than Apple raked in.</p></blockquote> <p>So, we’re to believe that Sony will rebound because revenue fell by $12-billion last year, but Sony still has more revenue than Apple? Gimme a break, Christian. Have you ever heard of profits? </p> <blockquote><p>While Apple’s influence in entertainment stems from the iTunes and iPod ecosystem and the fact that Jobs is the largest individual shareholder in Disney, Sony owns several movie studios and record labels. And just like Apple, Sony designs its own hardware, software, and services that work together.</p></blockquote> <p>Sigh. This is too easy. Chris, how well do Sony’s own hardware, software, and services <em>actually</em> work together. Oh. That’s right. They don’t. Maybe that has something to do with Apple’s success. Unlike Sony, Apple made things work together.</p> <blockquote><p>See, if anyone can take on Apple, it’s Sony.</p></blockquote> <p>How’s that working out so far?</p> <p>Christian is writing for Geek.com. Ostensibly run by, and read by, well, you know—geeks. Where’s the math? Exactly <em>how</em> is Sony going topple Apple’s position? How will Sony’s new products and services line up and compare against Apple’s current line? I’m a non-geek and I want to know. Where are the iPhone and iPad killers? How will they be better than Apple’s products?</p> <p>Here’s a painful truth. Market leaders are terribly difficult to unseat. Saying so doesn’t make it happen. Strutting and posturing does not bring customers in the door. Quality products and services that work well together actually matter to customers.</p> <p>Here’s another painful truth. Knocking off a market leader has requirements. If Company B wishes to sell more gadgets than Company A (taking away their customers), Company B must have a much better product, or a much less expensive product, or a much easier-to-use product. Any two will help the effort. In the end, it’s math. Sony can’t do the math. Neither can Geek.com.</p> <p>Geek.com + Sony - Apple = Fail. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/latest_sarah_palin_speech_opens" title="Latest Sarah Palin Speech Opens Sixth Seal">Latest Sarah Palin Speech Opens Sixth Seal</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/latest_sarah_palin_speech_opens_sixth_seal/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Latest Sarah Palin Speech Opens Sixth Seal"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>I don’t understand why <a href="http://www.theonion.com/content/news/latest_sarah_palin_speech_opens" title="this news event">this news event</a> wasn’t covered on Fox News. What Sarah Palin hath wrought:</p> <blockquote><p>Speaking unto an audience of anti-immigration advocates, global-warming deniers, and members of the Tea Party Nation, former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin gave forth utterances Monday that reportedly opened the sixth seal of the Book of the Apocalypse.</p></blockquote> <p>And:</p> <blockquote><p>“Small town folks—the folks who grow our food, run our small businesses, and teach our kids—are getting pretty riled up by President Obama’s big socialist ideas,” Palin spoke as the stage upon which she stood was rent apart by an unseen hand, opening as unto a great chasm, whose gaping void she narrowly escaped by clinging to the podium.</p></blockquote> <p>And finally:</p> <blockquote><p>Chaos and disorder then spread across hill and valley to every corner of the earth, eyewitnesses reported, and as the minions of the Antichrist prepared for their millennium of world dominion, even the teeming masses of heathens could not in their hearts deny that the final phase of Armageddon was close at hand, and that you’re darn right Joe Six-Pack pays too many taxes already.</p></blockquote> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Thursday, March 4, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.technightowl.com/2010/03/now-its-inevitable-flash-is-dying/" title="Flash is Dying!!">Flash is Dying!!</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/flash_is_dying/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Flash is Dying!"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Gene Steinberg’s <a href="http://www.technightowl.com/2010/03/now-its-inevitable-flash-is-dying/" title="TechNightOwl">TechNightOwl</a> on Flash:</p> <blockquote><p>In 1998, Apple killed the floppy drive. It took a few years for the rest of the industry to catch up, but the handwriting was clearly on the wall.</p></blockquote> <p>It took 10 years to eliminate the floppy disk drive.</p> <blockquote><p>Segue to 2007. Apple introduces the iPhone without support for Flash. People complain, but iPhones sell at ever-increasing rates. Today, with some 40 million of them around the world, and the iPad on the immediate horizon, Steve Jobs has made it quite clear that Flash is the floppy drive of the 21st century. It’s time for it to go.</p></blockquote> <p>When? How? <em>Soon</em> is rather ambiguous.</p> <blockquote><p>Flash will be history, and Adobe is just going to have to adapt to the situation and let those other products keep them in business. It’s not as if Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign are going away any time soon, even without Flash support.</p></blockquote> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Tuesday, March 2, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/02/virgin_america_html_flash/" title="Breakage from little cracks begin">Breakage from little cracks begin</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/breakage_from_little_cracks_begin/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Breakage from little cracks begin"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>What’s the impact of no Flash on the iPhone, iPod touch, and iPad? Most customers don’t care. Here’s another crack in Adobe’s Flash armor. Gavin Clarke in <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/03/02/virgin_america_html_flash/" title="The Register">The Register</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Start-up airline Virgin America has decided HTML is “good enough” for animating online content on its brand-new website, which went live Monday, dumping Flash.</p></blockquote> <p>Virgin CTO Ravi Simhambhatla:</p> <blockquote><p>I don’t want to cater to one hardware or one software platform one way to another, and Flash eliminates iPhone users. This year is going to be the year of the mobile [for Virgin]. When I looked at the Flash on our site, we weren’t using any Flash features except transition from one ad to another. When you use a technology, you want to use 70 to 80 per cent of the functionality.</p></blockquote> <p>The days of dominant, proprietary technologies on the internet are over. Goodbye Flash. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100302/apples-suits-against-htc-both-documents/" title="Apple Patent Lawsuit Aimed At Microsoft Or Google?">Apple Patent Lawsuit Aimed At Microsoft Or Google?</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apple_patent_lawsuit_aimed_at_microsoft_or_android/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Apple Patent Lawsuit Aimed At Microsoft Or Android?"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>This is the season to sue. The hottest item is Apple’s <a href="http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2010/03/02patents.html" title="lawsuit">lawsuit</a> against cell phone maker HTC (on the heels of a countersuit against cell phone giant Nokia). Apple CEO Steve Jobs:</p> <blockquote><p>We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it.We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.</p></blockquote> <p>It should be noted that HTC is the largest handset maker for Windows Mobile phones, and has made a large commitment to produce Google Android phones. John Maczkowski has a list of the complete court filings in <a href="http://digitaldaily.allthingsd.com/20100302/apples-suits-against-htc-both-documents/" title="AllThingsDigital">AllThingsDigital</a>.</p> <blockquote><p>Named as exhibits in the litigation, a handful of Android devices including Google’s (GOOG) Nexus One, the T-Mobile G1, the HTC Hero and the Droid Eris.</p></blockquote> <p>Jason Mick in <a href="http://www.dailytech.com/Apple+Claims+Invention+of+MultiTouch+Phone+CPU+Undervolting+Sues+HTC+to+Stop+Sales/article17811.htm" title="DailyTech">DailyTech</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Apple also has a pending countersuit against Nokia for similar cell phone patent infringement. In that suit, filed in December, Apple accuses Nokia of stealing technology covered by 13 iPhone-related patents.</p></blockquote> <p>Besides HTC, who is the lawsuit actually aimed at? Microsoft? Or, Google? Why not attack Google head on? Mick’s summary:</p> <blockquote><p>Is Apple a dreamy inventor turned innocent victim, exploited by greedy handset makers like it suggests? That’s open to debate. But it’s clear that Apple is eager to use litigation as a tool to try to knock down obstacles to its iPhone’s dominance.</p></blockquote> <p>It isn’t clear that the iPhone is in a dominant position in anything except mindshare, but it is clear that Apple will go to significant effort to protect the profitable device’s future.</p> <p>I think Apple is aiming at Google, not Microsoft. Windows Mobile is dead in the water. Windows Phone Series 7 won’t be a marketing reality until 2011, when Apple’s iPhone is well into version 4.0. The real target here is Google’s Android.</p> <p>Colin Gibbs in <a href="http://gigaom.com/2010/03/02/apple-taps-itc-to-kneecap-google/" title="GigaOm">GigaOm</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Today’s filing appears to be an attempt to slow Android, which has gained remarkable momentum in recent months. HTC offers the widest array of Android handsets of any manufacturer… and its Nexus One is the latest handset to be dubbed a potential “iPhone killer.” Throwing a legal hurdle at Android’s most prolific manufacturer appears to be an effort to slow Google’s roll in mobile.</p></blockquote> <p>Amen. If Apple can stop HTC’s Android from moving forward, what happens to other smart phone manufacturers who plan devices on Google’s fledgling but growing platform? </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Monday, March 1, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/190524/exmozilla_security_chief_takes_job_at_apple.html" title="Apple Hires Ex-Mozilla, Microsoft Security Exec">Apple Hires Ex-Mozilla, Microsoft Security Exec</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apple_hires_ex-mozilla_microsoft_security_exec/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Apple Hires Ex-Mozilla, Microsoft Security Exec"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Robert McMillan in <a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/190524/exmozilla_security_chief_takes_job_at_apple.html" title="PC World">PC World</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Former Mozilla security chief Window Snyder has been hired by Apple. Snyder started her new job Monday, where she’s now working as a senior security product manager, according to sources familiar with the situation. Apple is the third browser-maker in the past five years that has employed Snyder, who previously had worked as a security strategist at Microsoft where she managed the company’s relationships with security consultants and had worked on the Windows XP and Windows Server 2003 operating systems.</p></blockquote> <p>Scary, considering all the problems Mozilla and Microsoft have had with browser security issues. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://gawker.com/5482922/apple-only-wants-16%252B-year+olds-working-its-dodgy-sweatshops" title="Apple Only Wants 16+ Year-Olds Working Its Dodgy Sweatshops">Apple Only Wants 16+ Year-Olds Working Its Dodgy Sweatshops</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apple_only_wants_16_year-olds_working_its_dodgy_sweatshops/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Apple Only Wants 16+ Year-Olds Working Its Dodgy Sweatshops"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Ryan Tate in <a href="http://gawker.com/5482922/apple-only-wants-16%252B-year+olds-working-its-dodgy-sweatshops" title="Gawker">Gawker</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Apple products are made in factories that regularly employ young teenagers, constantly work people more than 60 hours per week, and falsify records to cover up their misdeeds.</p></blockquote> <p>The only problem with Tate’s statement? Facts. What’s his source?</p> <blockquote><p>That’s according to the shameless gossiping muckrakers at… uh, Apple Inc.</p></blockquote> <p>Apple released a <a href="http://www.apple.com/supplierresponsibility/" title="Supplier Responsibility 2010 Progress Report">Supplier Responsibility 2010 Progress Report</a> (PDF) which disclosed <em>three</em> instances which violated Apple’s policies.</p> <blockquote><p>Apple discovered three facilities that had previously hired 15-year-old workers in countries where the minimum age for employment is 16. Across the three facilities, our auditors found records of 11 workers who had been hired prior to reaching the legal age, although the workers were no longer underage or no longer in active employment at the time of our audit.</p></blockquote> <p>From that, Tate castigates Apple by writing that the company <em>regularly</em> hires underage workers, and <em>constantly</em> work them beyond 60 hours a week.</p> <p>Tate’s accusations put Gawker Valleywag clearly in the category of Fox News. What’s fair and balanced is really inaccurate and distorted for the sole purpose of sensationalizing issues. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://apple-investor.com/wlm/2010/03/breaking-news-apple-ipad-will-be-delayed.html" title="Ernest Rides Again: Apple iPad Delayed">Ernest Rides Again: Apple iPad Delayed</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/ernest_rides_again_apple_ipad_delayed/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Ernest Rides Again: Apple iPad Delayed"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Ernie Varitimos of <a href="http://apple-investor.com/wlm/2010/03/breaking-news-apple-ipad-will-be-delayed.html" title="AppleInvestor">AppleInvestor</a> says the iPad will be delayed. Apple still says the iPad will ship as scheduled near the end of March. Ernie’s logic:</p> <blockquote><p>Apple did not say that there wouldn’t be a smaller supply, they only said that the late March introduction is on schedule. They did not rebuke the claim that they would have only far fewer units than first planned, nor did they comment on a limited introduction to the US. If that is in fact the case, then the iPad will be delayed for many, many people.</p> <p>Apple had originally planned to deliver 1 million at launch but will only be able to deliver 300K. I would call that a delay for 700K people!</p></blockquote> <p>So, Apple is sharing product delivery information with Ernie Varitimos? I don’t think so. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Friday, February 26, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/02/ipad-magazines-newspapers/" title="Could iPad Apps Put Apple in Charge of the News?">Could iPad Apps Put Apple in Charge of the News?</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/could_ipad_apps_put_apple_in_charge_of_the_news/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Could iPad Apps Put Apple in Charge of the News?"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Do you think Apple’s iPad could change the face of newspaper and magazine publishing? If so, will that put Apple in charge of the news? Brian X. Chen postulates that question in <a href="http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2010/02/ipad-magazines-newspapers/" title="Wired">Wired</a>.</p> <blockquote><p>Publishers should think twice before worshipping the iPad as the future platform for magazines and newspapers. That is, if they value their independence from an often-capricious corporate gatekeeper.</p></blockquote> <p>I love a well turned phrase, but it’s hard to imagine print media publishers worshipping anyone other than themselves. Apple has a commanding presence in digital music downloads but do record company executives worship Jobs and Company?</p> <p>On the other hand, is Apple truly a ‘<em>capricious corporate gatekeeper?</em>’</p> <blockquote><p><strong>capricious</strong> |kəˈpri sh əs;-ˈprē-|<br /> adjective<br /> given to sudden and unaccountable changes of mood or behavior : <br /> <em>a capricious and often brutal administration</em> | <em>a capricious climate.</em></p></blockquote> <p>Is that Apple? Certainly. Do publishers need to be aware of Apple’s nature? Certainly. Will Apple’s iPad be <em>the</em> delivery mechanism for publishers in the 21st century. Certainly not.</p> <blockquote><p>The past week’s controversy swirling around Apple’s retroactive ban of sexy apps in the App Store seems trivial, but the implications of Apple’s arbitrariness should be disconcerting to members of the press and those who rely on the media for unbiased information.</p></blockquote> <p>Though Apple is being arbitrary, the controversy is trivial (except to the soft porn industry). And since when did the media provide <em>unbiased</em> information?</p> <blockquote><p>While it may initially appear publishers are more shielded from Apple’s ban hammer, the severity of the retroactive ban should be concerning for freedom-of-speech advocates.</p></blockquote> <p>Suddenly, Apple’s porn-purge-o-rama has become a freedom-of-speech issue. If I cook up honey coated turds and want Whole Foods to sell them, and they don’t, can I use the freedom-of-speech angle to get my way? It’s Apple’s store. They can sell what they want. And not sell what they don’t want. It’s not a freedom-of-speech issue.</p> <blockquote><p>Apple can do whatever it wants with the content in its App Store. Apple is not government, and thus it is not governed by the First Amendment. In light of the recent ban, many have correctly compared Apple’s App Store to Wal-Mart, which also doesn’t allow porn.</p></blockquote> <p>See? Brian agrees with me. So what’s the real issue?</p> <blockquote><p>It’s the fact that Apple has so much market power, combined with the fact that magazine and newspaper publishers are getting pumped to produce apps for Apple’s iPad, which will be served through Apple’s tightly regulated App Store. The iPad could very well play a major role in the future of publishing, with several of the biggest book publishers already on board to sell e-books through the iPad’s iBooks store, and major publications, including Wired, already working on iPad apps to launch in the App Store.</p></blockquote> <p><em>Market power?</em> Think about that for a moment. Microsoft has market power over the vast majority of the world’s personal computers. While that may not bode well for users, it doesn’t endanger the endangered species of print publishing.</p> <p>Likewise, Apple’s iTunes Store maintains a dominant position for digital media downloads. But Apple’s devices, and customers, make up but a small sliver of the world’s media-ingesting carbon-based creatures.</p> <p>Assume for a moment that Apple’s iPad takes a 20-percent share of the sub-$1,000 computing devices market segment. Is that 20-percent dominant? Still, without a single iPad sold, Chen worries for his print media brethren.</p> <blockquote><p>What will happen when a journalist writes a controversial story about abortion or vaccines? Will displeased readers skip writing angry letters to the publisher and go straight to Apple to get the article pulled? And would Apple then comply?</p></blockquote> <p>Will that same controversial story show up on the general world wide web? Yes. Do angry readers or ambulance-chasing attorneys seek to shut down Microsoft’s Internet Explorer (the browser which displayed the offending story)? Of course not.</p> <p>This whole argument is silly. But Chen persists:</p> <blockquote><p>I’m optimistic that Apple will eventually create a separate section in iTunes for digital newspapers and magazines, giving publishers a platform to distribute their digital content based on a strict, contractual agreement that prevents their content from being arbitrarily removed at Apple’s discretion.</p></blockquote> <p>Isn’t it likely that Apple wants no part of managing the content? They have a store. They stock the store with what they think will sell. They sell things. If some of what they sell impedes their ability to sell more, they’ll take it off the shelf. It’s business. Not free speech. Chen thinks not:</p> <blockquote><p>Peter Scheer, executive director of the First Amendment Coalition, said he understands Apple’s intention to keep its App Store immaculate, but its censorship — and the rise of more open alternatives such as Google Android — will drive loyal customers away.</p></blockquote> <p>It’s a store. If it doesn’t have what I want, I’ll buy what I want elsewhere. A pristine store without customers is not what Apple wants. That’s not what they have, either. Scheer:</p> <blockquote><p>What you’re limited to right now is Apple wants you to see in its little neighborhood, and it doesn’t want you to go into other neighborhoods. Eventually you embitter a lot of people who don’t understand why they’re being denied access to something they’d like to have on a device they have and they own.</p></blockquote> <p>That’s just silly. Does the lack of soft porn apps in the App Store prohibit iPhone or iPod touch or iPad customers from viewing soft porn on their respective devices? Hello? The last time I checked my iPhone it still had the Safari browser on it and it was still capable of viewing pretty much anything the internet provides.</p> <p>So it will be with print media publishers extending their brands, their content and their customer base via the iPad—one of many distribution and display devices they need to conquer.</p> <p>What’s not clearly understood by Chen or Scheer is that this whole process is a constantly evolving dynamic. Apple will adjust according to market requirements, not the unreasonable demands of freedom-of-speech and sky-is-falling fringe elements. Finally:</p> <blockquote><p>One thing’s for sure: With the iPad looming and the iPhone continuing to grow in popularity, Apple has to make some dramatic changes to the way it handles apps and runs the App Store. For now, the iPad and the App Store are hardly an ideal environment for newspapers and magazines to be reborn.</p></blockquote> <p>Dramatic changes? Or, mere adjustments to match the evolving landscape? Newspapers and magazines won’t be reborn on Apple’s iPad. The iPad is merely another corner newsstand, albeit a very cool one. If I can’t buy what I want there I’ll exercise my freedom of speech and tell the newsstand owner. If the owner doesn’t respond appropriately, I’ll go across the street.</p> <p>Apple has nothing to worry about. The dinosaurs of print media need to worry about other issues. I hear there’s a chilling frost this weekend. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/25/palm-ceo’s-letter-to-employees/" title="Palm CEO’s Letter to Employees">Palm CEO’s Letter to Employees</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/palm_ceos_letter_to_employees/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Palm CEO’s Letter to Employees"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Palm warned Wall Street of lower than expected sales for Q3. Palm CEO Jon Rubenstein issued a company-wide <a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2010/02/25/palm-ceo’s-letter-to-employees/" title="email message">email message</a> to employees.</p> <blockquote><p>Our softer than expected performance is due to slower than expected customer adoption of our products, which in turn has prompted our U.S. carrier partners to put additional orders on hold for the time being.</p></blockquote> <p>Translation: ‘Sales really stink.’</p> <blockquote><p>On a positive note, we expect to exit the quarter with over $500 million in cash on our balance sheet.</p></blockquote> <p>By comparison, Apple, Inc. has over $40-billion in cash; 80 times that of Palm. Palm is not ‘Apple, Jr.’ as <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apple_is_screwed_without_steve_jobs/" title="Dan Frommer">Dan Frommer</a> says. At best, Palm is an Apple miniscule wannabe. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Thursday, February 25, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/palm-is-proof-that-apple-is-screwed-without-steve-jobs-2010-2" title="Apple Is Screwed Without Steve Jobs?">Apple Is Screwed Without Steve Jobs?</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apple_is_screwed_without_steve_jobs/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Apple Is Screwed Without Steve Jobs?"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>There are plenty of Apple followers who worry about what Apple life would be like without co-founder and CEO Steve Jobs. Dan Fommer, in <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/palm-is-proof-that-apple-is-screwed-without-steve-jobs-2010-2" title="Business Insider">Business Insider</a>, equates Palm’s most recent disaster with Apple sans Steve Jobs:</p> <blockquote><p>Palm slashed its guidance today and shares are down 20%, as the company’s comeback attempt in the smartphone market hits a brick wall.</p></blockquote> <p>What’s the brick wall? Apple, of course. The iPhone continues to sell strongly despite a weakened worldwide economy.</p> <blockquote><p>In the short term, that’s good news for Apple, whose iPhone has been able to gain ground despite increased competition.</p></blockquote> <p>In the short term? Does that mean that Palm or Android or Microsoft of whomever will be the cause of Apple’s downfall without Steve Jobs?</p> <blockquote><p>But in the long term, it’s more evidence that Apple is screwed once visionary CEO Steve Jobs eventually leaves the company.</p></blockquote> <p>It’s difficult to say that a company with $40-billion in the bank and record sales and profits and market share would be screwed once the fabled leader is gone, but, I’m listening. Just how is Apple screwed?</p> <blockquote><p>Palm is basically Apple, Jr. And if a bunch of Apple geniuses can’t kick butt on their own at Palm, how are they going to kick butt without Steve at Apple?</p></blockquote> <p>WTF?</p> <p>Dan, are you serious? That’s a nicely turned phrase on an interesting premise, but how in God’s name is Palm equated as Apple, Jr? A bunch of misguided former Apple employees at Palm do not an Apple Jr. make.</p> <p>That’s ludicrous on its face.</p> <p>Palm does not have, and has not had for many years, a single capable product that has an Apple counterpart. Not one. There are substantive differences between Palm and Apple, even with the former stealing executives and engineers from the latter. Palm is short on resources. Apple is not. Palm is short on talent. Apple is not. Palm is short on leverage (one product helping to launch another). Apple is not. In fact, everything Palm is, Apple is not (and the other way around).</p> <blockquote><p>Palm’s previous management completely screwed up everything as smartphones began to take off, requiring a complete reboot. That’s not Rubinstein’s fault, and you could argue that the deck was stacked against him from the beginning. But the big idea was that Palm was supposed to be able to make and sell something better than the iPhone. And it has failed to do that.</p></blockquote> <p>Duh.</p> <p>But why? And how is the <em>why</em> of Palm’s disaster similar to an impending disaster at Apple when Steve Jobs leaves?</p> <blockquote><p>Steve Jobs is still the one calling the shots—making both big decisions and tiny ones. So far, he’s mostly made the right decisions, as far as which products to go after and which to avoid, user experience, acquisitions, strategy, features, pricing, etc. As a result, the Mac is growing, the iPhone has been huge, the iPod drove the company for years, and now the iPad could be a cool rival to netbook PCs.</p></blockquote> <p>Alright. I get it. Apple’s success rests completely upon Steve Jobs’ shoulders. And, when Steve Jobs leaves Apple, and someday he will, Apple immediately reverts to being like Palm—populated with bright engineers and executives who can’t design or engineer or market their way out of a paper bag.</p> <p>I don’t buy it. </p> <blockquote><p>Steve’s successors might have the same string of luck. But given Apple’s experience with and without Steve Jobs, and the futility of companies like Palm that try to clone the Apple magic without Steve Jobs, this seems unlikely.</p></blockquote> <p>There’s a big-assed fly in the ointment of that analysis.</p> <p>Apple tossed Steve Jobs out the door back in 1985, and the company continued to grow and prosper for half a dozen years; increased market share, revenue, and profits—well beyond what the co-founder left. For the first half dozen years <em>after</em> Steve Jobs returned to Apple the company was definitely not in kick-ass mode. Market share, revenue, and profit growth at Apple were, uh, to be kind, modest—definitely less than stellar.</p> <p>Was that Steve Jobs’ fault?</p> <p>Back in 1997 Apple bet the farm on OS X. It took many years for that bet to pay off. The iPod venture begat the iTunes Store which begat a growing halo effect on the Mac which begat the iPhone which begat the App Store—all of which combined to form huge growth in market share, revenue, and profits. Jobs’ fingerprints are all over the Apple of today, and we may worry about what will happen once dear leader is gone.</p> <p>Palm is not the Apple of seasons past. And the Apple of today is not Palm. Saying that Apple is screwed without Steve Jobs because Palm is screwed without Steve Jobs is to forget history. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://mac360.com/index.php/mac360/comments/first_look_new_quicken_essentials_for_mac_is_here/" title="Quicken for Mac rides again">Quicken for Mac rides again</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/quicken_for_mac_rides_again/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Quicken for Mac rides again"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Quicken Essentials for Mac is the latest attempt by Intuit to win back the hearts and minds and money of Mac users. Ron in <a href="http://mac360.com/index.php/mac360/comments/first_look_new_quicken_essentials_for_mac_is_here/" title="Mac360">Mac360</a>:</p> <blockquote><p>Quicken’s history with the Mac is long and spotted. It’s been ages since there was feature parity with the Windows version of Quicken. Quicken Essentials for Mac will continue that time-honored tradition.</p></blockquote> <p>Sigh. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Wednesday, February 24, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/405/apple-maybe-we-should-be-afraid.html" title="Maybe We Should Be Afraid Of Apple">Maybe We Should Be Afraid Of Apple</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/maybe_we_should_be_afraid_of_apple/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Maybe We Should Be Afraid Of Apple"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>Michael Wolf in <a href="http://www.newser.com/off-the-grid/post/405/apple-maybe-we-should-be-afraid.html" title="Newser">Newser</a> seems to think we should be afraid of Apple. Why? </p> <blockquote><p>Apple is a strange and dastardly company which, sooner rather than later, we’re going to regret pledging our allegiance to.</p></blockquote> <p>I’m probably like most of Apple’s customers. I have no allegiance to the company. I like their products, though I’m more of a techno voyeur. I like to watch the company’s antics.</p> <blockquote><p>The latest bit of no-good business is its arbitrary censoring of iPhone apps. This may be piddling, but it’s obviously part of the major control-freakishness that has always lurked below the surface in Cupertino, but which has now become broad-based corporate policy.</p></blockquote> <p>Except that by exercising such control Apple simply remains Apple. It’s what the company has done for many years. It’s not even news. It’s the way Apple does business. And it seems to be working rather well.</p> <blockquote><p>Just weeks ago there was the iPad rollout and its transparent designs on controlling the woe-begotten world of printed material.</p></blockquote> <p>If it was transparent then so much for Apple being a secretive company, right? Does anyone really think Apple would control print media with an iPad? What if the iPad gains a 20-percent market share of sub-$1,000 computing devices? Since when does 20-percent become <em>control</em>?</p> <blockquote><p>And need we forget, there’s the music business, fully occupied and colonized by Apple.</p></blockquote> <p>The iTunes Store has done well. It’s the biggest online retailer of music, TV shows, and movies. Yet, it does <em>not</em> dominate the market for media. If you don’t dominate how can you colonize? Wolff can turn a phrase. It would be nice if he could handle facts the same way.</p> <blockquote><p>Microsoft has come to seem eerily benign. Indeed, Apple becomes the poster child for a really sinister corporation. There may not be any corporation as militantly determined to have its way as Apple.</p></blockquote> <p>Wolf seems to be talking mind share vs. market share. Microsoft’s Windows remains on nearly 90-percent of the world’s PCs. Apple’s highly touted iPhone owns a tiny sliver of the cell phone market; a larger chunk of the smart phone segment. But control? Are there any facts and figures to back up the assertions, Michael?</p> <blockquote><p>Most companies can only dream of building a brand as strong as Apple’s, whereas Apple’s brand has reached a level where nothing it might do seems to hurt it. Apple has become the opposite of what it once was and somehow we don’t know it.</p></blockquote><p> </p> <p>I’ll take that as a no. </p> <p>Here’s where typical technology journalists—particularly the hit-whoring type—fall on their collective faces. Or, is it feces? That assertion would have been a good opportunity to describe in some detail what Apple <em>was</em>, and compare and contrast it what what Apple <em>is</em>. Somehow Wolff skipped over the opportunity. Why?</p> <p>It’s all about sex.</p> <blockquote><p>After all, why would Apple purge these adult-themed apps? What sense is there to that? And, apparently, it isn’t all sexy stuff. It’s just some sexy stuff, arbitrarily. It’s not even consistent, it’s just weird, unnecessarily, and mean-minded.</p></blockquote> <p>Without saying so, Wolff gets to the heart of the matter. For him. Apple has purged the iPhone’s App Store of sexually suggestive apps; clearly some of which Wolff spent his lunch money to purchase. Now, he can’t get his groove on with his phone and a fist, so he’s going to blame the <em>mercurial</em> Steve Jobs.</p> <blockquote><p>Steve Jobs may be the oddest fellow able to hold a full-time job in America and hardly anybody even makes fun of him. In fact, everybody’s afraid of him, not least of all because he is so strange and mercurial.</p></blockquote> <p>Steve Jobs and the Apple story are precisely what makes following Apple so much fun. It’s a better story line than soaps, or Lost, or politics, plus we get to play with all these cool toys and apps. And talk about Apple. But to accuse Apple of being a hard-nosed business, or to accuse them of being secretive or controlling, is to accuse the Pope of being Catholic, or to accuse the sun of being warm.</p> <blockquote><p>The iPhone itself is a beautiful tool, locked up tight and full of draconian protocols—with a little AT&T sado-masochistic abuse thrown in for good measure.</p></blockquote> <p>Great. Now let’s bash AT&T. I’m game. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Tuesday, February 23, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://ohnodoom.com/ibap/" title="iGotaBigAssPocket">iGotaBigAssPocket</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/igotabigasspocket/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: iGotaBigAssPocket"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>It was just a matter of time. From the <a href="http://ohnodoom.com/ibap/" title="OhNo!Doom Collective">OhNo!Doom Collective</a>:</p> <p><a href="http://pixobebo.com/images/uploads/20100223_pocket.jpg" onclick="window.open('http://pixobebo.com/images/uploads/20100223_pocket.jpg','popup','width=479,height=687,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://pixobebo.com/images/uploads/20100223_pocket_thumb.jpg" style="border: 0;" class="image" alt="Pocket" title="Pocket" width="420" height="608" /></a></p> <p>What else can you say? </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/347011/Google_Microsoft_Apple_Who_Will_Thrive_" title="Google, Microsoft, and Apple: Which one will thrive? Or not.">Google, Microsoft, and Apple: Which one will thrive? Or not.</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/google_microsoft_and_apple_which_one_will_thrive_or_not/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Google, Microsoft, and Apple: Which one will thrive? Or not?"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>The premise, from <a href="http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/347011/Google_Microsoft_Apple_Who_Will_Thrive_" title="Preston Gralla">Preston Gralla</a> in <em>Computerworld</em>:</p> <blockquote><p>Apple, Google and Microsoft are locked in a three-way struggle for industry dominance, competing to varying degrees on hardware, computer and cell phone operating systems, applications, entertainment, Internet search and more. Today, Google owns Internet search, Microsoft owns operating systems and applications, and Apple owns high-end hardware and entertainment and media devices.</p></blockquote> <p>Which will thrive? All are prospering, yes, but which company will <em>thrive</em> in the future? The difference is that Google is a one-trick pony. Advertising (via Google’s search engine). Microsoft prospers on past spoils, Windows and Office. What of Apple?</p> <blockquote><p>Apple, far more than Microsoft or Google, has a business model somewhat akin to that of a Hollywood studio: It requires blockbuster hits in order to bring in big profits. When Jobs leaves, those hits will stop coming.</p></blockquote> <p>So, let me get this straight. If Apple’s string of hits stop, it’s because Steve Jobs is gone? Forget about the resurgent and highly profitable Mac. Forget about the iPod or the iTunes Store. Forget about the iPhone. Apple will be brain dead when Steve Jobs leaves the company?</p> <p>The Hollywood analogy is interesting, but not apt. Blockbuster movies make big money quickly—in theaters first, then DVD sales and rentals. A hit movie’s initial revenue gains are lost over time, usually less than a year. Apple’s products continue to grow both revenue and profits and market share over time. How is that like a Hollywood studio? It’s not.</p> <p>Who will thrive? </p> <blockquote><p>Of the three companies, Google is best positioned to thrive in the future. It has a near monopoly on Internet search, the core of the world economy’s greatest growth engine. That gives it both an excellent base to expand upon, as well as a massive war chest it can depend on to fund new ventures.</p></blockquote> <p>So, let me get this straight. Google will thrive because it has a monopoly on search advertising, and a massive war chest. Didn’t Microsoft have a monopoly with Windows and Office? <em>And</em> a massive war chest? How’s that working out?</p> <p>Since when did <em>“the core of the world economy’s greatest growth engine”</em> become search advertising?</p> <p>Apple is the most diversified of the three companies, <em>and</em> has an even more massive war chest than Google or Microsoft, but will go into a long, slow decline (sounds like Microsoft) after CEO Steve Jobs leaves? What about Microsoft’s fortunes?</p> <blockquote><p>Unlike Apple, it doesn’t need big hits in order to grow. With a stranglehold on operating systems and productivity applications, and with solid enterprise tools, it will grow steadily. Google won’t be able to break its near monopoly.</p></blockquote> <p>Yet, both Windows <em>and</em> Office are in decline <em>already</em>, Windows Mobile is in <em>rapid</em> decline, and Microsoft’s other ventures have <em>only</em> lost money through the years, and continue to lose money. By the way, Google is an advertising company that runs a search engine. How would they break Microsoft’s so-called monopoly in a market segment where they don’t even complete against each other? The only way to do that would be to give away competing software for free. How’s that working out?</p> <blockquote><p>Microsoft won’t unseat Google as the Internet search leader, Bing shows that it can make plenty of money in that business.</p></blockquote> <p>Since Microsoft has never made <em>any</em> money in search, when and how will it show that it can?</p> <p>Gralla’s conclusions are totally lame.</p> <p>I can only conclude that authoring nearly three dozen books has depleted Gralla’s ability to think and write clearly. What’s fortunate is that he is doing so at a time when Computerworld’s editors don’t need insightful analysis, but are content with occasional hit-whoring articles to drive up page views and advertising impressions. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Monday, February 22, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/technology/23apps.html?src=twr&pagewanted=all" title="Apple Kills Indie Sex">Apple Kills Indie Sex</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/apple_kills_indie_sex/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: Apple Kills Indie Sex"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>It’s the 21st century and the Double Standard is alive and well at Apple. <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/23/technology/23apps.html?src=twr&pagewanted=all" title="Jenna Wortham">Jenna Wortham</a> of <em>The New York Times</em>:</p> <blockquote><p>Apple has started banning many applications for its iPhone that feature sexually suggestive material, including photos of women in bikinis and lingerie, a move that came as an abrupt surprise to developers who had been profiting from such programs.</p></blockquote> <p>What about the popular Sport Illustrated Swimsuit Edition, and the Playboy app? Apple VP Phil Schiller:</p> <blockquote><p>The difference is this is a well-known company with previously published material available broadly in a well-accepted format.</p></blockquote> <p>What a crock. Apple’s screw ups over iPhone apps are becoming the norm. It’s OK for big media to sell soft porn, but not OK for independent media to sell soft porn. Make up your mind, Apple. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="frame_news"> <div class="date">Friday, February 19, 2010</div> <dl> <dt><a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-os-4-features-2010-2" title="15 Features Apple Must Build Into iPhone OS 4">15 Features Apple Must Build Into iPhone OS 4</a><a class="permalink" href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/newslinks/15_features_apple_must_build_into_iphone_os_4/" title="Permanent link on PixoBebo to: 15 Features Apple Must Build Into iPhone OS 4"> » </a> </dt> <dd> <p>What should Apple do to improve the iPhone, and add to the iPad? <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/iphone-os-4-features-2010-2" title="Dan Frommer">Dan Frommer</a> pushes his top 15 list in Silicon Alley Insider:</p> <blockquote><p>The most common request was for background processing so that third-party apps could run in the background, while other apps are running in the foreground. The idea is that this will make apps more useful, ranging from Internet radio apps that can keep streaming, to messaging apps that can keep receiving messages while you’re doing other stuff.</p></blockquote> <p>A common request, yes, but mostly from geeks and pundits, not average users. My favorites: a unified Mail inbox, and push notifications on the lock screen. </p> </dd> </dl> </div> <div class="paginate"> <div class="right"><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/news/category/news_comment/P20/" title="Go to the Next Page">Next Page</a> »</div> </div> </div> </div> <div id="region_right"> <div class="search_box"> <form method="post" action="http://pixobebo.com/index.php" > <div class='hiddenFields'> <input type="hidden" name="ACT" value="19" /> <input type="hidden" name="XID" value="a5e6933e806fc3af078d474bd9ec4101d9a75493" /> <input type="hidden" name="RP" value="pixonomy/search_results" /> <input type="hidden" name="NRP" value="" /> <input type="hidden" name="RES" value="30" /> <input type="hidden" name="status" value="" /> <input type="hidden" name="weblog" value="pixobebo" /> <input type="hidden" name="search_in" value="everywhere" /> <input type="hidden" name="where" value="any" /> <input type="hidden" name="site_id" value="1" /> </div> <label for="keywords">Quick Search: </label> <span class="wrapper_keywords"><input type="text" id="keywords" name="keywords" value="" size="24" maxlength="140" /></span> <input type="submit" value="Search" class="submit" /> </form> </div> <div class="ad_rectangle_336x280"> <script type="text/javascript"> </script> <script type="text/javascript" src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js"> </script> </div> <div class="frame_column_left"> <div class="ad_banner_120x240"> <script type='text/javascript'></script><noscript><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=acd58d01&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=21292&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=acd58d01' border='0' alt='' /></a></noscript> </div> <div class="recent_list"> <h4>More Reviews</h4> <ul><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/why_kill_obsolete_technologies/" title="Recent Review of Why Kill Obsolete Technologies?">Why Kill Obsolete Technologies?</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/improve_iphoto_with_keyword_manager/" title="Recent Review of Improve iPhoto With Keyword Manager">Improve iPhoto With Keyword Manager</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/see_the_future_of_cloud_computing_in_sumo_paint/" title="Recent Review of See the future of cloud computing in Sumo Paint">See the future of cloud computing in Sumo Paint</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/igtd_the_drug_that_makes_mac_users_more_productive/" title="Recent Review of iGTD: The Drug That Makes Mac Users More Productive">iGTD: The Drug That Makes Mac Users More Productive</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/the_coming_of_apples_very_perfect_storm/" title="Recent Review of The coming of Apple’s very perfect storm">The coming of Apple’s very perfect storm</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/a_challenge_to_microsoft_office_2008_for_mac_users/" title="Recent Review of A challenge to Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac users">A challenge to Microsoft Office 2008 for Mac users</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/why_your_mac_needs_a_security_blanket/" title="Recent Review of Why your Mac needs a security blanket">Why your Mac needs a security blanket</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/is_it_ok_to_use_your_mac_as_an_alarm_clock/" title="Recent Review of Is it OK to use your Mac as an alarm clock?">Is it OK to use your Mac as an alarm clock?</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/zune_hd_vs._ipod_touch/" title="Recent Review of Zune HD vs. iPod touch">Zune HD vs. iPod touch</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/cellphone_politics_and_the_iphone/" title="Recent Review of Cellphone Politics and the iPhone">Cellphone Politics and the iPhone</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/how_to_manage_the_disaster_of_a_dead_hard_drive/" title="Recent Review of How To Manage The Disaster Of A Dead Hard Drive">How To Manage The Disaster Of A Dead Hard Drive</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/a_cheap_mac_does_not_a_bargain_make/" title="Recent Review of A Cheap Mac Does Not A Bargain Make">A Cheap Mac Does Not A Bargain Make</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/hate_the_macs_dock_fix_it_this_way/" title="Recent Review of Hate the Mac’s Dock? Fix it this way.">Hate the Mac’s Dock? Fix it this way.</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/how_to_satisfy_your_craving_for_mac_eye_candy/" title="Recent Review of How to satisfy your craving for Mac eye candy">How to satisfy your craving for Mac eye candy</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/ipad_competition_runs_flash/" title="Recent Review of iPad competition runs Flash">iPad competition runs Flash</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/add_magic_to_your_macs_cut_and_paste/" title="Recent Review of Add Magic To Your Mac’s Cut And Paste">Add Magic To Your Mac’s Cut And Paste</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/extreme_makeover_with_arttext_and_cssedit/" title="Recent Review of Extreme Makeover with ArtText and CSSEdit">Extreme Makeover with ArtText and CSSEdit</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/add_a_fancy_zoom_to_web_site_photos/" title="Recent Review of Add a Fancy Zoom to Web Site Photos">Add a Fancy Zoom to Web Site Photos</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/goodbye_mac_hello_windows_vista/" title="Recent Review of Goodbye Mac, Hello Windows Vista">Goodbye Mac, Hello Windows Vista</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/i_thinks_i_cringley_is_an_ibozo/" title="Recent Review of I thinks I, Cringley is an iBozo">I thinks I, Cringley is an iBozo</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/mac_users_beware_twitter_gives_you_cancer/" title="Recent Review of Mac Users Beware: Twitter Gives You Cancer?">Mac Users Beware: Twitter Gives You Cancer?</a></li><li><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/articles/apples_coming_radio_shack_problem/" title="Recent Review of Apple’s coming Radio Shack problem">Apple’s coming Radio Shack problem</a></li></ul> </div> </div> <div class="frame_column_right"> <div class="ad_skyscraper_160x600"> <script type='text/javascript'></script><noscript><a href='http://d1.openx.org/ck.php?n=a5b14f96&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE' target='_blank'><img src='http://d1.openx.org/avw.php?zoneid=21283&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a5b14f96' border='0' alt='' /></a></noscript> </div> <script type='text/javascript' src="http://widgets.twimg.com/j/2/widget.js"></script> <script type='text/javascript'> new TWTR.Widget({ version: 2, type: 'profile', rpp: 5, interval: 6000, width: 178, height: 300, theme: { shell: { background: '#7ea81f', color: '#ffffff' }, tweets: { background: '#303430', color: '#d4d4d4', links: '#7ea81f' } }, features: { scrollbar: false, loop: false, live: false, hashtags: true, timestamp: true, avatars: false, behavior: 'all' } }).render().setUser('PixoBebo').start(); </script> </div> <div class="region_pad"> </div> </div> </div> <div id="wrapper_footer"> <div id="region_footer"> <div class="backtotop"><a href="#top" class="anchorLink" title="Back to the Top of the Page">Back to Top</a></div> <div class="logo_small"></div> <div class="tla"> <ul style="list-style: none; padding: 0; width: 100%; margin: 0;"> <li style="clear: none; display: block; padding: 0; width: 50%; float: left; margin: 0;"> <a href="http://www.accessorygeeks.com/motorola-droid-accessories.html">Motorola Droid Accessories</a> </li> <li style="clear: none; display: block; padding: 0; width: 50%; float: left; margin: 0;"> <a href="http://www.tonercartridgedepot.com/">Toners for printers, copiers, faxes</a> </li> <li style="clear: none; display: block; padding: 0; width: 50%; float: left; margin: 0;">Simply the Best <a href="http://www.imtoo.com/video-converter.html">Video Converter</a> </li> <li style="clear: none; display: block; padding: 0; width: 50%; float: left; margin: 0;"> <a href="http://www.cheap-cigarettes-sale.com/">cheap cigarettes sale</a> </li> <li style="clear: none; display: block; padding: 0; width: 50%; float: left; margin: 0;"> <a href="http://www.ipodrobot.com/blog/how-to-bulk-delete-sms-messages-from-iphone-without-jailbreak.htm">How to bulk delete iPhone SMS messages</a> </li> <li style="clear: none; display: block; padding: 0; width: 50%; float: left; margin: 0;"> <a href="http://www.theistore.com">iPod Accessories</a> </li> </ul></div> <div id="navlinks"> <p><a href="http://pixobebo.com/" title="PixoBebo Home">Home</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/reviews/" title="Reviews">Reviews</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/how_to/" title="How To">How To</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/opinions/" title="Opinions">Opinions</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/news/category/news_comment/" title="News Links">News Links</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/search/" title="Advanced Search">Search</a> • <a href="http://twitter.com/pixobebo/" title="PixoBebo on Twitter">Twitter</a></p> <p><a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/archive/" title="Article Archive">Archive</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/about_pixobebo" title="About">About</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixobebo_faqs" title="Frequently Asked Questions">FAQs</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/about_kate_mackenzie/" title="All About Kate MacKenzie">Kate Mac</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/categories/category/information" title="Info">Info</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/rss_atom/" title="RSS Feed">RSS Feed</a> • <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/contact/" onclick="window.open('http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/contact','popup','width=440,height=550,scrollbars=no,resizable=yes,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false" title="How to Contact PixoBebo">Contact</a></p> </div> </div> </div> <div id="wrapper_copyright"><div id="region_copyright"><div class="region_pad"> <p>Copyright © 2005 - 2010 <a href="http://pixobebo.com/" title="Kate MacKenzie">Kate MacKenzie</a>, Brooklyn, NY. All Rights Reserved.</p><p>PixoBebo is edited and published by <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/information/about_kate_mackenzie/" title="About Kate MacKenzie">Kate MacKenzie</a>, Brooklyn, NY. Follow Kate on <a href="http://twitter.com/PixoBebo/" title="Kate on Twitter">Twitter</a>. Syndicated <a href="http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/rss_atom/" title="RSS Feed for Articles and Updates">RSS Feed</a>.</p> <p>PixoBebo pages are best viewed in <a href="http://www.apple.com/safari/" title="Safari">Safari</a> 4.x or <a href="http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/firefox.html" title="Firefox">Firefox</a> 3.x browsers. Microsoft Internet Explorer is not supported.</p><p>Developed on a Mac, powered by an Apple Xserve at <a href="http://www.serverlogistics.com/" title="Apple Xserve at ServerLogistics">ServerLogistics</a>. Valid <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=referer">XHTML 1.0</a> and <a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http://pixobebo.com/index.php/pixonomy/style.default.css">CSS 2.1</a>.</p> <p>This PixoBebo web page was rendered in 0.5383 seconds.</p></div></div></div> </div> </body> </html>